State-by-State Legal Status Guide – Workplace Drug and Alcohol Testing Laws
This page is not intended as a substitute for the legal advice of an attorney or that of a drug-testing expert, knowledgeable of the user’s individual circumstances.
WORKPLACE DRUG AND ALCOHOL STATE-BY-STATE LEGAL STATUS GUIDE
This document provides an overview of the status and procedural requirements for drug and alcohol testing from state to state. Several types of law govern drug and alcohol testing. Mandatory laws lay out requirements for any employer in that state who conducts testing. Voluntary laws provide requirements only for an employer who elects to participate in the voluntary law in order to receive a benefit, such as limited legal protection. If an employer chooses not to participate, it is not affected by the voluntary law requirements. Voluntary state laws are marked as such in this document; otherwise a state law is mandatory. Brief notes are provided at the end of each state summarizing workers’ compensation and unemployment compensation laws as they relate to drug and alcohol testing. Any requirements for workers’ and unemployment compensation apply only when testing is used to deny benefits and are usually separate from the mandatory or voluntary workplace testing law in a given state.
ABBREVIATIONS
- American Association for Clinical Chemistry (AACC)
- Blood alcohol content (BAC)
- Blood alcohol test (BAT)
- Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA)
- College of American Pathologists (CAP)
- Department of Transportation (DOT)
- Employee assistance program (EAP)
- Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
- Forensic Urine Drug Testing (FUDT)
-
Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) Medical review o cer (MRO)
National Highway Tra c Safety Administration (NHTSA) National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)Point of care testing (POCT)
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Administration (SAMHSA)
Unemployment compensation (UC) Workers’ compensation (WC)
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Legal status for workplace drug and alcohol testing
Alabama has a voluntary drug testing law. For companies that wish to qualify for a
5% discount on their workers’ compensation premiums they must comply with this law; other companies are not mandated to comply with this statute. THIS CHART REFLECTS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE VOLUNTARY LAW.ALABAMA CODE 25-5-330 to 25-5-340 (2000) ALABAMA CODE 480-5-6-1 to .04 (1996)
Area of focus
Status
Comments
Setting/circumstance
Defined
The following types of testing are required with conditions: pre-employment, periodic, follow-up and for cause. Return-to-duty, post-accident and random permitted, but not required.
Drugs tested (pan
Defined
Amphetamines, cannabinoids, phencyclidine, methadone, opiates, cocaine, methaqualone, barbiturates, benzodiazepines, propoxyphene, or a metabolite of any of these substances.
Specimens permitted
Defined
Broadly defined: tissue, blood, breath, urine, or other product of the human body capable of revealing the presence of drugs or their metabolites or of alcohol.
POCT screening devices
Prohibited
Permitted outside this voluntary law but not by companies that wish to qualify for the WC discount.
Alcohol testing
Permitted
Must comply with U.S. DOT standards; positive equals .04 for safety-sensitive jobs, .08 for all other jobs.
EAP
See Comments
Employers must provide either an EAP or information about how to access EAP-type services.
Certified laboratory
Required
SAMHSA- or CAP-certified labs only.
WC premium discount
Permitted
When compliant with law qualifies for 5% discount.
WC claim denial or reduction
Permitted
Refer to ALA Code 25-5-51 (2006). Requires compliance with 49 CFR part 40 drug and alcohol testing regulations.
Unemployment denial
Permitted
Refer to ALA Code 25-4-78 (Supp. 2005). Requires compliance with 49 CFR part 40 drug and alcohol testing regulations or equivalent standards.
Legal status for workplace drug and alcohol testing
Alaska has a voluntary drug testing law. For companies that wish to qualify for limited legal protections they must comply with this law; other companies are not mandated to comply with this statute. THIS CHART REFLECTS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE VOLUNTARY LAW.
ALASKA STATUTES 23.10.600 – 23.10.699
Area of focus
Status
Comments
Setting/circumstance
Defined
Permitted in all circumstances. However, if testing is conducted, it must be done among all employees, including management. As well, pre-employment testing must be post-offer. Random testing is limited to safety-sensitive positions per case law. Post-accident is limited to those believed to have contributed to causing the accident.
Drugs tested (panel)
Defined
Drugs with SAMHSA-established cut-off levels at a minimum. See Alaska Statutes Title 11, Chapter 71 for a list of controlled substances included in the state’s definition of “drugs.” Notice of other drugs to be tested for and their cut-off levels must be given to donors in advance.
Specimens permitted
Defined
Urine or breath only.
POCT screening devices
Permitted
FDA-cleared devices only; many conditions apply; positives must be confirmed with GC-MS; written record of result must be provided to individual.
Alcohol testing
Permitted
Permitted for employees; not permitted for applicants.
EAP
Not Mentioned
Certified laboratory
Required
When not using on-site kits lab must be certified by SAMHSA, CAP, American Assn. of Clinical Chemists.
WC premium discount
Not Mentioned
WC claim denial or reduction
Permitted
Refer to Alaska Statute §23.30.235.
Unemployment denial
Permitted
Refer to Alaska Statutes §23.20.379. Requires compliance with voluntary law.
Legal status for workplace drug and alcohol testing
Arizona has a voluntary drug testing law. For companies that wish to qualify for limited legal protections they must comply with this law; other companies are not mandated to comply. THIS CHART REFLECTS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE VOLUNTARY LAW.
ARIZ. REV. STAT. ANN. 23-493 TO -493.11 (1995 & SUPP. 2005) (TITLE 23, CHAPTER 2, ARTICLE 14)
Area of focus |
Status |
Comments |
Setting/circumstance |
Defined |
Permitted in all circumstances. If testing is conducted, it must be done among all employees, including management. Post-accident testing is only permitted immediately after event and of those suspected of causing the accident. |
Drugs tested (panel) |
Defined |
Any substance considered unlawful under the schedules of the controlled substances section of the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970 (P.L. 91-513; 84 Stat. 1247; 21 United States Code section 812) or the metabolite of the substance. |
Specimens permitted |
Defined |
Urine, blood, hair, saliva, breath or other body specimens. |
POCT screening devices |
See Comments |
Even though the law expressly requires drug testing to be done in a laboratory, it contains a clause stating that nothing in the statute “shall be construed to encourage, discourage, restrict, limit, prohibit or require on-site drug testing or alcohol impairment testing.” (23-493.04 E) |
Alcohol testing |
Permitted |
Permitted; .08 or above is positive by a “scientifically accepted method.” |
EAP |
Not Mentioned |
|
Certified laboratory |
Required |
SAMHSA, CAP or Arizona Dept. of Health Services. |
WC premium discount |
Not Mentioned |
|
WC claim denial or reduction |
Prohibited |
Arizona Revised Statutes Annotated §23-1021 was ruled unconstitutional by the AZ Supreme Court in Grammatico v. The Industrial Commission. |
Unemployment denial |
Permitted |
Refer to Arizona Revised Statutes §23-619.01; requires employer to conduct drug and alcohol testing in compliance with the guidelines of the voluntary law (Title 23, chapter 2, article 14). |
ARKANSAS
Legal status for workplace drug and alcohol testing
Arkansas has a voluntary drug testing law. For companies that wish to qualify for a 5% discount on their workers’ compensation premiums they must comply with this law; other companies are not mandated to comply with the statute. THIS CHART REFLECTS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE VOLUNTARY LAW.
ARK. CODE ANN. 11-14-101 TO 11-14-112 (2002 & SUPP. 2003): ARK. REGS, RULE 36
Area of focus |
Status |
Comments |
Setting/circumstance |
Defined |
Permitted in all circumstances. The following is required: of all workers in a particular class of job. enter rehab; testing must occur at least once a year for a 2-year period. |
Drugs tested (panel) |
Defined |
SAMHSA panel. |
Specimens permitted |
Defined |
Specimen means “tissue, fluid, or a product of the human body capable of revealing the presence of alcohol, drugs or their metabolites.” |
POCT screening devices |
Prohibited |
|
Alcohol testing |
Required |
Specific requirements for alcohol testing are included in the statute. |
EAP |
Not Required |
Mentioned, but specifically not required. Must provide sampling of info on available EAPs in area. |
Certified laboratory |
Required |
Licensed by state and in compliance with SAMHSA, CAP, or other state-recognized certification. |
WC premium discount |
Permitted |
5%. |
WC claim denial or reduction |
Permitted |
Refer to Arkansas Code Annotated § 11-9-102(4)(B)(iv). |
Unemployment denial |
Permitted |
Refer to Arkansas Code Annotated § 11-10-514(b). Requires drug or alcohol test to be conducted in accordance with DOT regulations and the employer’s written policy. |
CALIFORNIA
Legal status for workplace drug and alcohol testing
Case law affects who can be tested and under what circumstances. Additionally, San Francisco has an ordinance that restricts drug testing in a number of ways. Employers should consider legal decisions related to drug testing prior to establishing a drug-free workplace program that includes any type of drug testing.
THIS STATE DOES NOT HAVE DRUG TESTING LEGISLATION. SEE INTRODUCTION.
Area of focus |
Status |
Comments |
Setting/circumstance |
See Comments |
Definition affected by case law and stringent privacy law. Applicant testing for safety-sensitive occupations is upheld by case law; probably permitted for others, but not in case law. Post-accident only if drug abuse is suspected and best limited to safety-sensitive workers. Periodic exam only if it is part of a pre-employment exam. Return-to-duty is also restricted to safety-sensitive positions. Random is not recommended, no matter what industry. All other circumstances are restricted. |
Drugs tested (panel) |
Not Mentioned |
|
Specimens permitted |
Not Mentioned |
|
POCT screening devices |
Restricted |
Dept. of Health does not actively seek to restrict on-site tests or POCT. Cal. Business & Professions Code §1206 requires all tests to take place at a certified laboratory. |
Alcohol testing |
Restricted |
Same qualifications apply as for drug testing. |
EAP |
Not mentioned |
|
Certified laboratory |
See Comments |
Strongly encouraged given the litigious environment in the state. Refer to Cal. Business & Professions Code §1206 for requirement of who can conduct such a test. |
WC premium discount |
Not Mentioned |
|
WC claim denial or reduction |
Permitted |
Refer to California Labor Code §3600. |
Unemployment denial |
Permitted |
Refer to Unemployment Insurance Code §1256.4. |
CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Legal status for workplace drug and alcohol testing
San Francisco has a very restrictive drug testing law. Employers’ rights are very limited when it comes to when drug testing can take place, and who may be drug tested. Employers are advised to refer to the city’s law very carefully before implementing a drug testing program.
SAN FRANCISCO, CAL., POLICE CODE ART. 33A (1993)
Area of focus |
Status |
Comments |
Setting/circumstance |
Defined |
Testing is limited to substances that are likely to impact an individual’s ability to perform their job safely. Applicant, return-to-duty, and alcohol testing are permitted. Reasonable suspicion is ok if there are reasonable grounds to believe the individual’s faculties are impaired on the job and if there is a clear and present danger to the physical safety of the employee or others. Post-accident, periodic, and random are all prohibited. |
Drugs tested (panel) |
Not Mentioned |
However, testing is limited to substances that are likely to impact an individual’s ability to perform their job safely. |
Specimens permitted |
Not Mentioned |
The law only refers to urine and blood. |
POCT screening devices |
Restricted |
Dept. of Health does not actively seek to restrict employers from conducting on-site tests or POCT. Refer to Cal. Business & Professions Code §1206 for the law that requires all tests to take place at a certified laboratory. |
Alcohol testing |
Permitted |
|
EAP |
Not Mentioned |
|
Certified laboratory |
See Comments |
Strongly encouraged given the litigious environment in the state. Refer to Cal. Business & Professions Code §1206 for the requirement of who can conduct such a test. |
WC premium discount |
Not Mentioned |
|
WC claim denial or reduction |
Permitted |
Refer to California Labor Code §3600. |
Unemployment denial |
Permitted |
Refer to Unemployment Insurance Code §1256.4. |
COLORADO
Legal status for workplace drug and alcohol testing
The City of Boulder has a drug testing ordinance (5195) that contains several restrictive elements. Employers in THIS STATE DOES NOT HAVE Boulder should consult that city’s ordinance. Colorado has a Workers’ Compensation Reduction Law that may DRUG TESTING LEGISLATION. affect testing. There is a medical marijuana law, but it does not require employers to accommodate workplace use.
Area of focus |
Status |
Comments |
Setting/circumstance |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
Drugs tested (panel) |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
Specimens permitted |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
POCT screening devices |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
Alcohol testing |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
EAP |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
Certified laboratory |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
WC premium discount |
Not Mentioned |
|
WC claim denial or reduction |
Permitted |
Refer to COLO. REV. STAT. §8-42-112.5. |
Unemployment denial |
Permitted |
Refer to COLO. REV. STAT. §8-73-108(5)(e)(VIII) & (IX). |
COLORADO, BOULDER
Legal status for workplace drug and alcohol testing
Boulder has a restrictive drug testing law that only applies to employers BOULDER, COLO., HUMAN RIGHTS CODE with business operations within the city. §§12-3-1 TO -6 (1994)
Area of focus |
Status |
Comments |
Setting/circumstance |
Restricted |
All testing circumstances are prohibited or restricted. Applicant testing is post-offer only. Reasonable suspicion is permitted if there is clear belief of intoxication or job performance is suffering. Post-accident must meet reasonable suspicion criteria. Return to duty as part of rehabilitation. Follow-up if part of EAP. Periodic and random are prohibited. |
Drugs tested (panel) |
Not Mentioned |
|
Specimens permitted |
Not Mentioned |
However, the law requires split specimen confirmation, which may exclude some types of specimen. |
POCT screening devices |
Permitted |
But should not be relied upon as final result. |
Alcohol testing |
Permitted |
|
EAP |
Not Required |
|
Certified laboratory |
Not Required |
Recommended when using a laboratory. |
WC premium discount |
Not Mentioned |
|
WC claim denial or reduction |
Permitted |
Refer to COLO. REV. STAT. §8-42-112.5. |
Unemployment denial |
Permitted |
Refer to COLO. REV. STAT. §8-73-108(5)(e)(VIII) & (IX). |
CONNECTICUT
Legal status for workplace drug and alcohol testing
Connecticut is a drug testing friendly state though its law places restrictions TITLE 31. LABOR, CHAPTER 557, on random testing. 31-51T TO 31-51AA
Area of focus |
Status |
Comments |
Setting/circumstance |
Defined |
All circumstances are permitted, however some restrictions apply. Applicants must be notified in advance and receive written notice of positive results. Post-accident must meet reasonable suspicion criteria. Random testing must follow federal requirements and limit to safety-sensitive workers, or be part of EAP when employee participates voluntarily. |
Drugs tested (panel) |
Not Mentioned |
|
Specimens permitted |
Defined |
Only urine testing is mentioned, though other specimens are not specifically prohibited. Oral fluid specifically permitted according to Dept. of Health (Jan. 2011). |
POCT screening devices |
Permitted |
Screen only; laboratory confirmation required. |
Alcohol testing |
Permitted |
|
EAP |
Not Mentioned |
|
Certified laboratory |
Not Mentioned |
Advisable to use SAMHSA or other certified lab. |
WC premium discount |
Not Mentioned |
|
WC claim denial or reduction |
Permitted |
Refer to Connecticut Workers’ Compensation Act §31-275(c). |
Unemployment denial |
Permitted |
Refer to §31-236.14. |
DELAWARE
Legal status for workplace drug and alcohol testing
Delaware is a drug testing friendly state with few requirements or restrictions THIS STATE DOES NOT HAVE except in certain industries. A DRUG TESTING STATUTE.
Area of focus |
Status |
Comments |
Setting/circumstance |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
Drugs tested (panel) |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
Specimens permitted |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
POCT screening devices |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
Alcohol testing |
Permitted |
|
EAP |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
Certified laboratory |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
WC premium discount |
Not Mentioned |
|
WC claim denial or reduction |
Permitted |
Refer to Delaware Code Annotated title 19, § 2353 (1995). |
Unemployment denial |
Permitted |
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Legal status for workplace drug and alcohol testing
The District of Columbia does not have a drug testing statute. THIS STATE DOES NOT HAVE A DRUG TESTING STATUTE.
Area of focus |
Status |
Comments |
Setting/circumstance |
Not Defined |
However, there is case law that upholds that random testing must be restricted to safety-sensitive occupations. Additionally, a law passed in August 2015 limits applicant testing for marijuana to post-offer circumstances. |
Drugs tested (panel) |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
Specimens permitted |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
POCT screening devices |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
Alcohol testing |
Permitted |
|
EAP |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
Certified laboratory |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
WC premium discount |
Not Mentioned |
|
WC claim denial or reduction |
Permitted |
Refer to DC Code §32-1503(d). |
Unemployment denial |
Permitted |
Refer to DC Code §51-110(b)(2) and 7 DCMR §312.3. |
FLORIDA
Legal status for workplace drug and alcohol testing
Florida has a voluntary drug testing law. For companies that wish to qualify for a 5% discount on their workers’ compensation premiums they must comply with this law; other companies are not mandated to comply. Certain construction contractors must comply with this law. School bus drivers are required to be drug tested. THIS CHART REFLECTS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE VOLUNTARY LAW.
FLORIDA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CODE SECTION 440.102
Area of focus |
Status |
Comments |
Setting/circumstance |
Defined |
Certain types are required: applicant, reasonable suspicion, post-accident, and follow-up. Other types are permitted but not required: periodic exam, return-to-duty, and random. |
Drugs tested (panel) |
Defined |
Amphetamine, marijuana, cocaine, PCP, methadone, methaqualone, opiates, barbiturates, benzodiazepines, propoxyphene, or their metabolites. |
Specimens permitted |
Defined |
“Specimen” means tissue, hair, or a product of the human body capable of revealing the presence of drugs or their metabolites. Florida lab regulations only permit urine testing. (See 59A-24.004 Drugs to be Tested/Body Specimens.) |
POCT screening devices |
Permitted with limitations |
Per July 2009 amendment on-site testing is now permitted as part of the Workers’ Comp Premium Discount law. Employers may not deny or terminate employment based on an initial screen result that has not been confirmed by a lab and verified by an MRO. The law clearly limits which professionals are permitted to collect a specimen and it requires a split specimen, all of which may impact the use of a POCT device. |
Alcohol testing |
Permitted |
|
EAP |
Not Required |
Must provide information about EAPs to employees. If employer pays for EAP or rehab, he or she may choose which program an employee participates in. |
Certified laboratory |
Required |
Must be licensed by Florida’s Agency for Health Care Administration or SAMHSA. |
WC premium discount |
Permitted |
5% upon approval by the state. |
WC claim denial or reduction |
Permitted |
Refer to § 440.101 and § 440.09. |
Unemployment denial |
Permitted |
Refer to Florida Statute Annotated § 443.101. |
Legal status for workplace drug and alcohol testing
Georgia has a voluntary drug testing law. For companies that wish to qualify for a 7.5% discount on their workers’ compensation premiums they must comply with
this law; other companies are not mandated to comply with this statute. THIS CHART REFLECTS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE VOLUNTARY LAW.
GA CODE ANN. 34-9-410 TO -421 (1998 & SUPP. 2003); GA CODE ANN. 33-9-40.2 (SUPP. 2005)
Area of focus |
Status |
Comments |
Setting/circumstance |
Defined |
Certain types of testing are required: applicant (post-offer), reasonable suspicion, post-accident, periodic exam, and follow-up. Other types are permitted but not required: return-to-duty and random. |
Drugs tested (panel) |
Defined |
Amphetamine, marijuana, cocaine, PCP, methadone, methaqualone, opiates, barbiturates, benzodiazepines, propoxyphene, or their metabolites. |
Specimens permitted |
Defined |
Tissue, blood, breath, urine, or other product of the human body capable of revealing the presence |
POCT screening devices |
Permitted |
For pre-employment screens only; positives must be confirmed at a lab (urine and oral fluid permitted). |
Alcohol testing |
Required |
By blood, urine, breath of other bodily substance; 0.08 is considered positive. |
EAP |
Not Required |
However, must provide information to employee of other available assistance programs. |
Certified laboratory |
Required |
When using a lab, SAMHSA- and CAP-certified labs only. |
WC premium discount |
Permitted |
7.5% upon approval by the state. |
WC claim denial or reduction |
Permitted |
Refer to Georgia Code 34-9-17. If an individual refuses to submit to a drug or alcohol test “performed in the manner set forth in Code Section 34-9-415” then a “rebuttable presumption that the accident and injury or death were caused by the consumption of alcohol or the ingestion of marijuana or a controlled substance.” |
Unemployment denial |
Permitted |
Refer to Georgia Code 34-8-194. Requires compliance with voluntary law. |
HAWAII
Legal status for workplace drug and alcohol testing
Hawaii places no restrictions on drug testing circumstances but has very speci c requirements on how drug testing is conducted. The law requires that written notice be given prior to the collection of a sample every time a drug test is conducted.
HAW. REV. STAT. §329B-1 -8 (1998) HAWAII ADMINISTRATIVE RULES TITLE 11 DEPT. OF HEALTH CHAPTER 13
Area of focus |
Status |
Comments |
Setting/circumstance |
Not Defined |
All types of testing permitted. |
Drugs tested (panel) |
Defined |
Substances of abuse or their metabolites shall include marijuana, cocaine, amphetamines, opiates, PCP, barbiturates, methaqualone, benzodiazepines, propoxyphene, methadone, alcohol and any other controlled substances defined by Hawaii law. |
Specimens permitted |
Defined |
Urine (and blood under limited circumstances) according the state Dept. of Health is permitted; as of July 2007 POCT oral fluid specifically permitted. |
POCT screening devices |
Permitted |
Must use FDA-cleared device or a device “manufactured by a facility that is minimally certified as meeting ISO 13485 standards”; lab confirmation required; MRO review required; operator must be trained by manufacturer; oral fluid devices permitted as of July 2007 for employee and applicant testing. |
Alcohol testing |
Permitted |
0.02 BAC considered positive. |
EAP |
Not Mentioned |
|
Certified laboratory |
Required |
SAMHSA- or state-certified lab only when a laboratory is utilized. |
WC premium discount |
Not Mentioned |
|
WC claim denial or reduction |
Permitted |
Refer to Hawaii Revised Statutes §386-3. |
Unemployment denial |
Permitted |
Refer to Hawaii Revised Statutes §383-30. Admin. Rules 5-12-51 specifically mention intoxication as misconduct. |
IDAHO
Legal status for workplace drug and alcohol testing
Idaho has a voluntary drug testing law. For companies that wish to qualify for limited legal protections and/or a reduction in workers’ compensation premiums they must comply with this law; other companies are not mandated to comply with this law. THIS CHART REFLECTS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE VOLUNTARY LAW.
IDAHO CODE 72-1701 TO 1716 (1999 & SUPP. 2002)
Area of focus |
Status |
Comments |
Setting/circumstance |
Not Defined |
All types of testing permitted: however, all employees, including management, must be subject to testing. |
Drugs tested (panel) |
Not Defined |
|
Specimens permitted |
Not Defined |
|
POCT screening devices |
Permitted |
Non-negative results must be confirmed at laboratory. |
Alcohol testing |
Permitted |
Permitted (breath or saliva mentioned; confirmation on initial screen positive required). |
EAP |
Not Mentioned |
|
Certified laboratory |
Not Mentioned |
However, lab confirmation is required. |
WC premium discount |
Permitted |
No details specified; qualification and rate are determined by the insurer. |
WC claim denial or reduction |
Permitted |
Refer to Idaho Code §72-208. |
Unemployment denial |
Permitted |
Refer to Idaho Code §72-1366(5), §72-1707, §72-1709, and §72-1701. |
ILLINOIS
Legal status for workplace drug and alcohol testing
Workers’ compensation denial law requires compliance with DOT drug and alcohol testing regulations. A separate law exists that mandates and regulates drug testing by public works employers.
THIS STATE DOES NOT HAVE A DRUG TESTING STATUTE.
Area of focus |
Status |
Comments |
Setting/circumstance |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
Drugs tested (panel) |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
Specimens permitted |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
POCT screening devices |
Permitted |
Urine and oral fluid. |
Alcohol testing |
Permitted |
|
EAP |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
Certified laboratory |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
WC premium discount |
Not Mentioned |
|
WC claim denial or reduction |
Permitted |
Refer to 820 ILCS 305/11. Compliance with DOT drug and alcohol testing regulations is required. |
Unemployment denial |
Permitted |
Refer to 820 ILCS 405/602. Law defines misconduct as including violation of a known rule or policy. Illinois Department of Employment Security (IDES) Unemployment Insurance Law Handbook states that violation of a drug-free workplace policy constitutes misconduct under UC denial law. |
ILLINOIS PUBLIC WORKS
Legal status for workplace drug and alcohol testing
Public Act 095-063, the “Substance Abuse Prevention on Public Work Projects Act” only applies to an employer that is a “contractor or subcontractor performing a public works project.” It does not apply generally to any other employers.
PUBLIC ACT 095-063 (820 ICS 265)
Area of focus |
Status |
Comments |
Setting/circumstance |
Defined |
Certain types are required: applicant, reasonable suspicion, post-accident, random. Others are permitted but not required: return-to-duty. Others are not mentioned in law: periodic exam, follow-up. |
Drugs tested (panel) |
Defined |
Minimum 9 panel test is required; specific drugs are not listed in the statute. Additionally, alcohol testing is required. |
Specimens permitted |
Defined |
Blood may only be used for post-accident testing; however, it is not mandatory when urine testing is available. |
POCT screening devices |
Prohibited |
Only lab-based testing is permitted. |
Alcohol testing |
Required |
0.02 BAC is considered positive. |
EAP |
See Comments |
Employees who violate the law must be “approved to commence or return to work” on a public works project. The implication being that someone must grant that approval. See also Section 20.3 of law. |
Certified laboratory |
Required |
Must use lab certified by SAMHSA. |
WC premium discount |
N/A |
See Illinois. |
WC claim denial or reduction |
N/A |
See Illinois. |
Unemployment denial |
N/A |
See Illinois. |
INDIANA
Legal status for workplace drug and alcohol testing
This state does not have a general drug testing statute; however, THIS STATE DOES NOT HAVE A drug testing may be required under certain circumstances. DRUG TESTING STATUTE.
Area of focus |
Status |
Comments |
Setting/circumstance |
Not Defined |
However, state public works contractors must conduct random testing; child care workers must be subject to drug testing; other occupations may also be required to be subject to drug testing. |
Drugs tested (panel) |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
Specimens permitted |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
All specimens permitted. |
POCT screening devices |
Permitted |
|
Alcohol testing |
Permitted |
Required of child care workers. |
EAP |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
Certified laboratory |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
WC premium discount |
Not Mentioned |
|
WC claim denial or reduction |
Permitted |
Refer to Indiana Code §22-3-2-8. |
Unemployment denial |
Permitted |
Refer to Indiana Code §22-4-15-1(a) & (d)(6). |
IOWA
Legal status for workplace drug and alcohol testing
Iowa is a drug-testing friendly state though some restrictions apply. Virtually all testing circumstances are permitted, drug panel is widely de ned, and instant testing is permit- ted. No burdensome restrictions are placed on how drug testing may be conducted.
IOWA CODE §730.5 IOWA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE RULE 641-12.1-12.21
Area of focus |
Status |
Comments |
Setting/circumstance |
Defined |
Pre-employment and employee testing permitted, including random which is subject to collective bargaining agreements where applicable. Post-accident for accidents that total $1000 in property damage or more. |
Drugs tested (panel) |
Defined |
Substance considered according to & included in Schedule I, II, III, IV, or V under the Federal Controlled Substances Act, 21 U.S.C. §801 et seq. |
Specimens permitted |
Defined |
Urine, blood, breath, and oral fluid. Blood restricted to post-accident when person providing treatment requests it; not by employer request. |
POCT screening devices |
Permitted |
Lab confirmation required for initial screen positives. |
Alcohol testing |
Permitted |
Per SAMHSA/DOT regulations; some conditions apply. |
EAP |
Mentioned |
Employers must at a minimum provide information of available local EAP services; cost of rehab mentioned, but not specifically required of employer. |
Certified laboratory |
Required |
SAMHSA or state Department of Health certified lab. |
WC premium discount |
Not Mentioned |
|
WC claim denial or reduction |
Permitted |
Refer to Iowa Code Ann §85.16. |
Unemployment denial |
Permitted |
Refer to Iowa Code Ann §96.5. Misconduct mentioned, but not defined. |
KANSAS
Legal status for workplace drug and alcohol testing
This state has workers’ compensation reduction and unemployment KAN. STAT. ANN. 65-1,107 TO -1,108A (2002), 44-706 denial laws that contain speci c drug testing requirements for quali cation. (SUPP.2005) & KAN. ADMIN. REGS. 28-33 (1997)
Area of focus |
Status |
Comments |
Setting/circumstance |
Not Defined |
|
Drugs tested (panel) |
Defined |
SAMHSA panel. |
Specimens permitted |
Defined |
Specifically mentions urine, blood and saliva, but does not limit testing to these specimens. |
POCT screening devices |
See Comments |
Attorney General has concluded that employers using on-site testing kits are not subject to state laboratory regulations; however, the Dept. of Health disagrees and supposedly enforces the law with regard to on-site testing by employers. |
Alcohol testing |
Not Mentioned |
|
EAP |
Not Mentioned |
|
Certified laboratory |
Required |
Must be licensed by the state. Lab must meet the requirements of the federal government’s Clinical Laboratory Improvement Act amendments of 1988. Federal cut-off levels must be used. |
WC premium discount |
Not Mentioned |
|
WC claim denial or reduction |
Permitted |
Refer to Kansas Stat. Ann. §44-501. See Notes. Article 5, Workers’ Compensation. Very specific drug testing procedures are required. |
Unemployment denial |
Permitted |
Refer to Kansas Stat. Ann. §44-706(b)(2) & (t). Very specific drug testing procedures are required. |
KENTUCKY
Legal status for workplace drug and alcohol testing
This state has a voluntary law that offers a workers’ compensation premium discount to qualifying 803 KAR 25:280 companies (KRS §304.13-167 offers the discount). 803 KAR 25:280 contains the actual drug testing
requirements. There is also a mandatory mining industry law that is not re ected in this chart.
Area of focus |
Status |
Comments |
Setting/circumstance |
Defined |
The following types of testing are required: applicant, reasonable suspicion, post-accident, random, and follow-up. Periodic and return-to-duty are not mentioned. |
Drugs tested (panel) |
Defined |
11 panel urine test: amphetamines, cannabinoids/THC, cocaine, opiates, phencyclidine (PCP), benzodiazepines, propoxyphene, methaqualone, methadone, barbiturates, and synthetic narcotics. |
Specimens permitted |
Defined |
Urine for drugs; breath for alcohol; programs using other specimen may receive certification anyway if the specimen testing method is as accurate as another equivalent to breath and urine. |
POCT screening devices |
Prohibited |
Lab testing only. |
Alcohol testing |
Required |
Breath; 0.04% maximum cutoff level; after conditional offer of employment; upon reasonable suspicion; post-accident; follow-up. Other requirements apply. See statute for compliance. |
EAP |
Required |
Must be hosted internally or contracted to external provider. |
Certified laboratory |
Required |
NLCP and SAMHSA. |
WC premium discount |
Permitted |
5%. |
WC claim denial or reduction |
Permitted |
Refer to Kentucky Revised Statutes §342.610(3). |
Unemployment denial |
Permitted |
Refer to Kentucky Revised Statutes §341.370(6). |
LOUISIANA
Legal status for workplace drug and alcohol testing
Employers may qualify for liability protection when in compliance with the LOUISIANA REV. STAT. ANN. 49 1001-1012 state’s drug testing law. Exclusion language exists for the Oil & Gas Industry. LOUISIANA ACT NO. 901
Area of focus |
Status |
Comments |
Setting/circumstance |
Not Defined |
|
Drugs tested (panel) |
Defined |
The law only applies to testing for “marijuana, opioids, cocaine, amphetamines, and phencyclidine”; the law specifically states that it does not preclude or regulate testing for substances found in the federal government’s Schedules I, II, III and IV and alcohol. |
Specimens permitted |
Defined |
Urine, blood, saliva and hair are included in the definition of a “sample.” |
POCT screening devices |
Permitted |
Requires FDA-cleared device; initial screen positives must be confirmed. |
Alcohol testing |
Mentioned |
Mentioned but not required; alcohol is listed among the substances for which employers may test. |
EAP |
Not Mentioned |
|
Certified laboratory |
Required |
SAMHSA- or CAP-FUDT–certified lab only. |
WC premium discount |
Not Mentioned |
|
WC claim denial or reduction |
Permitted |
Refer to Louisiana Revised Statutes Annotated § 23:1081. Contains specific drug testing requirements. |
Unemployment denial |
Permitted |
Refer to Louisiana Revised Statutes Annotated § 23:1601 (10). Contains specific drug testing requirements. |
MAINE
Legal status for workplace drug and alcohol testing
While drug testing is permitted in Maine, its law places many restrictions on employers. This chart provides only a relatively brief overview. It is strongly recommended that readers review the state’s statute before implementing or revising any drug testing practice.
TITLE 26 LABOR AND INDUSTRY CHAPTER 7 EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES SUBCHAPTER III-A SUBSTANCE ABUSE TESTING
Area of focus |
Status |
Comments |
Setting/circumstance |
Defined |
All types of testing are allowed but with restrictions (i.e. safety-sensitive, documented justification, etc.). Exception: periodic exams are most likely prohibited. See statute for specific language. |
Drugs tested (panel) |
Defined |
Any scheduled drug, alcohol or other drug, or any of their metabolites. |
Specimens permitted |
Defined |
Urine only per the DOL 6-12-07; blood can be tested under specific circumstances. See statute for details. DOL indicated in 2015 that it will adopt the same regulations for lab-based oral fluid being developed by SAMHSA once they are finalized. |
POCT screening devices |
Permitted |
Generally considered prohibited; however the statute allows for non-instrumented POCT. |
Alcohol testing |
Restricted |
Must meet same restrictions as for drug testing. |
EAP |
Required |
Company w/ more than 20 employees must have EAP in order to drug test. Must be certified by Department of Health and Human Services. |
Certified laboratory |
Required |
NIDA, CAP, AACC, state’s Dept. of Human Services. |
WC premium discount |
Not Mentioned |
|
WC claim denial or reduction |
Permitted |
Refer to Maine Revised Statutes Title 39-A, Chapter 5, §202. |
Unemployment denial |
Permitted |
Refer to Maine Revised Statutes Title 26 §1043(23)(A)(7). |
MARYLAND
Legal status for workplace drug and alcohol testing
Maryland permits all types of employee testing and job applicant testing. On-site testing is permitted for pre-employment testing only. Very speci c requirements apply to laboratories performing tests.
HEALTH-GENERAL TITLE 17 LABORATORIES SUBTITLE 214-217 MARYLAND REGULATIONS CODE TITLE 10.10.10.01-.09
Area of focus |
Status |
Comments |
Setting/circumstance |
Not Defined |
|
Drugs tested (panel) |
Defined |
Drug, substance, or immediate precursor as set forth in Schedules I-V of Criminal Law §5-101 & §5-202. |
Specimens permitted |
Defined |
Urine, blood, oral fluid and, for pre-employment testing only, hair. |
POCT screening devices |
Permitted |
Pre-employment only; must use FDA-approved device; lab confirmation and MRO required for positives; chain of custody procedures; all records from “preliminary testing” must be retained for 1 year; $50 registration fee required every 2 years. |
Alcohol testing |
Permitted |
Specimens limited to urine, blood, oral fluid and, for pre-employment testing only, hair. |
EAP |
Not Mentioned |
|
Certified laboratory |
Required |
Licensed by the state of Maryland; SAMHSA/CAP/HCFA; at donor’s request employer must provide name and address of the lab that will test the donor’s specimen. |
WC premium discount |
Not Mentioned |
|
WC claim denial or reduction |
Permitted |
Refer to Maryland Code, Article – Labor and Employment (gle) §9-506 (c). |
Unemployment denial |
Permitted |
Refer to Maryland Code §8-1002-1003. Drug use is not listed as misconduct/gross misconduct which is required for denial of benefits. |
MASSACHUSETTS
Legal status for workplace drug and alcohol testing
This state does not have a drug testing statute, though there have been landmark legal decisions that have shaped how drug testing can be conducted. The state’s narrow privacy law also impacts workplace drug testing.
THIS STATE DOES NOT HAVE A DRUG TESTING STATUTE.
Area of focus |
Status |
Comments |
Setting/circumstance |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
However, it is recommended that random testing be limited to safety-sensitive workers per privacy and case law. |
Drugs tested (panel) |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
Specimens permitted |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
POCT screening devices |
Permitted |
|
Alcohol testing |
Permitted |
|
EAP |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
Certified laboratory |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
WC premium discount |
Not Mentioned |
|
WC claim denial or reduction |
See Comments |
Refer to General Laws Part 1, Title XXI, Ch. 152, Sec. 27 concerning willful misconduct. Law does not specifically refer to drug or intoxication in connection with misconduct. |
Unemployment denial |
Permitted |
Refer to General Laws Part 1, Title XXI, Ch. 151A, Sec. 25 mentions illegal drug use at work and drunkenness while at work. It does not mention drug testing procedures. |
MICHIGAN
Legal status for workplace drug and alcohol testing
Michigan does not have a state drug testing law.
THIS STATE DOES NOT HAVE A DRUG TESTING STATUTE.
Area of focus |
Status |
Comments |
Setting/circumstance |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
Drugs tested (panel) |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
Specimens permitted |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
POCT screening devices |
Permitted |
|
Alcohol testing |
Permitted |
|
EAP |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
Certified laboratory |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
WC premium discount |
Not Mentioned |
|
WC claim denial or reduction |
Permitted |
Refer to MCL §418.305 concerning willful misconduct. The law does not mention drug testing or intoxication constituting willful misconduct. |
Unemployment denial |
Permitted |
Refer to Michigan Employment Security Act §421.29. |
MINNESOTA
Legal status for workplace drug and alcohol testing
Minnesota has a restrictive state drug testing law with many detailed requirements. It is strongly recommended that employers and others refer directly to the state’s statutory language to ensure compliance.
MINNESOTA STATUTE ANNOTATED §§ 181.950 TO -.957
Area of focus |
Status |
Comments |
Setting/circumstance |
Restricted |
All types of testing permitted with restrictions (i.e. post-offer only for applicant, safety-sensitive only, etc.). See statute. |
Drugs tested (panel) |
Not Defined |
Not specified; “drug” means a controlled substance. |
Specimens permitted |
Defined |
Body component sample. |
POCT screening devices |
Prohibited |
Must use laboratory. |
Alcohol testing |
Permitted |
All testing must take place at a certified laboratory. |
EAP |
Not Mentioned |
|
Certified laboratory |
Required |
“NIDA” (SAMHSA)/CAP/state of New York. |
WC premium discount |
Not Mentioned |
|
WC claim denial or reduction |
Permitted |
Refer to Minn. Stat. Ann. §176.021(1). |
Unemployment denial |
Permitted |
Refer to Minn. Stat. Ann. §268.095(6). |
Legal status for workplace drug and alcohol testing
This state has a voluntary drug testing law that provides limited legal protections to employers that conduct drug and alcohol testing in compliance with the guidelines contained in the statute. A 5% workers’ compensation discount program is also available and administered directly by insurers.
TITLE 15 – MISSISSIPPI DEPT. OF HEALTH, PT. III – OFFICE OF HEALTH PROTECTION, SUBPART 01 – HEALTH FACILITIES LICENSURE & CERTIFICATION, CHAPT. 53 TITLE 71 LABOR AND INDUSTRY CHAP. 7 DRUG & ALCOHOL TESTING
Area of focus |
Status |
Comments |
Setting/circumstance |
Restricted |
All types of testing are permitted with restrictions (i.e. written notice for applicant, reasonable suspicion for post-accident, etc.). See statute. |
Drugs tested (panel) |
Defined |
Amphetamine, marijuana, cocaine, phencyclidine, methadone, methaqualone, opiates, barbiturates, benzodiazepines, propoxyphene, or their metabolites… other controlled substances with federal cut-off levels established. |
Specimens permitted |
Defined |
Urine for drugs; breath or saliva for initial alcohol screen, and blood for alcohol confirmation per Dept. of Health (Title 15). |
POCT screening devices |
Permitted |
Confirmation testing and chain of custody protocols are required. |
Alcohol testing |
Permitted |
Breath or saliva for screens; positives confirmed with blood. |
EAP |
Required |
Must either provide internal EAP or resource file of external EAP type services available to employee. |
Certified laboratory |
Required |
CLIA, SAMHSA, CAP, or state Board of Health. Required for confirmation testing. |
WC premium discount |
Permitted |
|
WC claim denial or reduction |
Permitted |
Refer to Mississippi Code §71-3-7(d). This law was amended and approved by the governor of Mississippi on 5-14-2012. The changes took effect 1 July 2012. |
Unemployment denial |
Permitted |
Refer to Mississippi Code §71-7-13(3) & §71-5-513(1)(b). Caution: §71-5-513, which classifies misconduct as means for denial of benefits, has been repealed effective July 1, 2014. As of that date, the statutory language may change. §71-3-13, which classifies discharge for drug/alcohol abuse as misconduct, has not been repealed. |
MISSOURI
Legal status for workplace drug and alcohol testing
While Missouri does not have a drug testing statute, employers must meet
certain drug testing requirements in order to challenge workers’ and unemployment comp claims.
THIS STATE DOES NOT HAVE A DRUG TESTING STATUTE.
Area of focus |
Status |
Comments |
Setting/circumstance |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
Except for workers’/unemployment comp cases. In which case, types of testing must be clearly stated in written policy. |
Drugs tested (panel) |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
Specimens permitted |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
No restrictions apply except for employers who wish to contest a workers’ or unemployment compensation claim, in which case “specimen” means tissue, fluid, or a product of the human body capable of reveal- ing the presence of alcohol or drugs or their metabolites…” |
POCT screening devices |
Permitted |
Lab analysis required for programs that wish to challenge workers’ or unemployment compensation claims. |
Alcohol testing |
Permitted |
|
EAP |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
Certified laboratory |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
Except in workers’/unemployment comp cases. |
WC premium discount |
Not Mentioned |
|
WC claim denial or reduction |
Permitted |
Refer to Missouri Rev. Stat. §287.120.6. |
Unemployment denial |
Permitted |
Refer to Missouri Rev. Stat. §288.045, 050(2). |
MONTANA
Legal status for workplace drug and alcohol testing
Montana places detailed restrictions regarding the circumstances under which drug testing can be conducted; references to federal drug testing requirements are found throughout the Montana law.
MONT. CODE ANN. §39-2-205-211 (1995 & SUPP. 1998; 2005 amendments)
Area of focus |
Status |
Comments |
Setting/circumstance |
Restricted |
All types of testing are permitted with restrictions (i.e. reasonable suspicion and damages over $1,500 for post-accident, etc.). Employers must meet several conditions in order to conduct random testing. |
Drugs tested (panel) |
Defined |
SAMHSA panel (other substances may be tested for as long as procedures used are as stringent as those in 49 CFR Part 40). |
Specimens permitted |
Defined |
Urine or oral fluid; breath for alcohol. |
POCT screening devices |
See Comments |
Probably. Positives must be confirmed at lab. Chain of custody and other testing procedures should be at least as stringent as those in 49 CFR Part 40 and the device used must be FDA-approved. |
Alcohol testing |
Permitted |
Per DOT regs. Device from Conforming Products List only, 0.04 or greater is positive. Administered by certified BAT only. |
EAP |
Mentioned |
Policy must include information about available EAP services. |
Certified laboratory |
Required |
Requires compliance with 49 CFR part 40. |
WC premium discount |
Not Mentioned |
|
WC claim denial or reduction |
Permitted |
Refer to Montana Code Ann. §39-71-407(5–7). |
Unemployment denial |
Permitted |
Refer to Montana Code Ann. §39-51-2303 concerning “misconduct” and ARM §24.11.461 for “specific acts of misconduct.” |
NEBRASKA
Legal status for workplace drug and alcohol testing
Nebraska has a very open workplace drug testing law. For example, NEBRASKA REVISED STATUTES all types of testing are permitted. CHAPTER 48-1901-1910
Area of focus |
Status |
Comments |
Setting/circumstance |
Not Defined |
|
Drugs tested (panel) |
Not Defined |
|
Specimens permitted |
Defined |
Body fluid and breath. |
POCT screening devices |
Permitted |
For screens only; confirm positives at lab. |
Alcohol testing |
Permitted |
Breathalyzer required; employee may request confirmatory retest with blood. |
EAP |
Not Required |
|
Certified laboratory |
Required |
CLIA labs required for confirmation testing. |
WC premium discount |
Not Mentioned |
|
WC claim denial or reduction |
Permitted |
Refer to Nebraska Revised Statute §§48-102, 48-127. |
Unemployment denial |
Permitted |
Refer to Nebraska Revised Statutes §48-628(2). |
NEW HAMPSHIRE
Legal status for workplace drug and alcohol testing
New Hampshire does not restrict drug testing.
THIS STATE DOES NOT HAVE A DRUG TESTING STATUE.
Area of focus |
Status |
Comments |
Setting/circumstance |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
Drugs tested (panel) |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
Specimens permitted |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
POCT screening devices |
Permitted |
|
Alcohol testing |
Permitted |
|
EAP |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
Certified laboratory |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
WC premium discount |
Not Mentioned |
|
WC claim denial or reduction |
Permitted |
Refer to New Hampshire Statutes §281-A:14. |
Unemployment denial |
Permitted |
Refer to New Hampshire Statutes §282-A:34(I). |
NEW JERSEY
Legal status for workplace drug and alcohol testing
New Jersey’s state constitution contains privacy language that limits THIS STATE DOES NOT HAVE A drug testing to situations when there is reasonable cause. DRUG TESTING STATUE.
Area of focus |
Status |
Comments |
Setting/circumstance |
Restricted |
Privacy language in the state constitution restricts testing to reasonable suspicion situations. Random is permitted in safety-sensitive occupations per case law. |
Drugs tested (panel) |
Not Defined |
|
Specimens permitted |
Not Defined |
|
POCT screening devices |
Restricted |
Testing location may need to be licensed through state as a laboratory. Only FDA-cleared devices are permitted. |
Alcohol testing |
Permitted |
|
EAP |
Caution |
Case law underscores the importance of educating workers. |
Certified laboratory |
Required |
State has a laboratory licensing law that applies to drug testing. |
WC premium discount |
Not Mentioned |
|
WC claim denial or reduction |
Permitted |
Refer to New Jersey Statutes Annotated §34:15-7 does not refer to drug testing procedures. |
Unemployment denial |
Permitted |
Refer to New Jersey Statutes Annotated §34:21-5 does not refer to drug testing procedures. |
NEW MEXICO
Legal status for workplace drug and alcohol testing
New Mexico does not have a drug testing statute; however, in workers’ compensation denial cases employers must demonstrate compliance with the DOT drug and alcohol testing regulations.
THIS STATE DOES NOT HAVE A DRUG TESTING STATUE.
Area of focus |
Status |
Comments |
Setting/circumstance |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
Drugs tested (panel) |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
DOT drug and alcohol testing procedures must be observed in workers’ compensation denial cases. |
Specimens permitted |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
DOT drug and alcohol testing procedures must be observed in workers’ compensation denial cases. |
POCT screening devices |
Permitted |
|
Alcohol testing |
Permitted |
DOT drug and alcohol testing procedures must be observed in workers’ compensation denial cases. |
EAP |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
Certified laboratory |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
DOT drug and alcohol testing procedures must be observed in workers’ compensation denial cases. |
WC premium discount |
Not Mentioned |
|
WC claim denial or reduction |
Permitted |
Refer to New Mexico Stat. Ann. §52-1-11, 12, & 12.1. Full denial if intoxication is cause of accident. 10% reduction if intoxication is only contributing factor. Must follow DOT regs. in order to use drug test result as proof of intoxication. |
Unemployment denial |
Permitted |
Refer to New Mexico Stat. Ann. §51-1-7(2) concerning misconduct as means for disqualification; intoxication is not specified as misconduct in statutory language. |
NEW YORK
Legal status for workplace drug and alcohol testing
New York does not have a drug testing statute. However, Code Rule 60 is a voluntary program that permits employers to put certain safety-related programs in place that qualify them for workers’ compensation credits. This chart does not re ect the requirements of Code Rule 60.
THIS STATE DOES NOT HAVE A DRUG TESTING STATUE.
Legal status for workplace drug and alcohol testing
Nevada does not have a drug testing statute and there are no restrictions on the type of testing an employer can conduct, who can be tested, and under what circumstances a test can be required. The only exception to this is that the state Attorney General has determined that drug tests must take place at a laboratory.
THIS STATE DOES NOT HAVE A DRUG TESTING STATUTE.
Area of focus |
Status |
Comments |
Setting/circumstance |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
Drugs tested (panel) |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
Specimens permitted |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
POCT screening devices |
Prohibited |
NAC 652 regulates point-of-care testing, but makes it very difficult to comply. |
Alcohol testing |
Permitted |
|
EAP |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
Certified laboratory |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
Recommended. |
WC premium discount |
Not Mentioned |
|
WC claim denial or reduction |
Permitted |
Refer to Nevada Rev. Stat. §616C.230(1)(c)(d). |
Unemployment denial |
Permitted |
Refer to Nevada Rev. Stat. §612.385, concerning miscond
uct. Case law upholds that alcohol or drug use against an employer’s drug-free workplace policy constitutes misconduct.
|
NEW HAMPSHIRE
Legal status for workplace drug and alcohol testing
New Hampshire does not restrict drug testing.
THIS STATE DOES NOT HAVE A DRUG TESTING STATUE.
Area of focus |
Status |
Comments |
Setting/circumstance |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
Drugs tested (panel) |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
Specimens permitted |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
POCT screening devices |
Permitted |
|
Alcohol testing |
Permitted |
|
EAP |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
Certified laboratory |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
WC premium discount |
Not Mentioned |
|
WC claim denial or reduction |
Permitted |
Refer to New Hampshire Statutes §281-A:14. |
Unemployment denial |
Permitted |
Refer to New Hampshire Statutes §282-A:34(I). |
NEW JERSEY
Legal status for workplace drug and alcohol testing
New Jersey’s state constitution contains privacy language that limits THIS STATE DOES NOT HAVE A drug testing to situations when there is reasonable cause. DRUG TESTING STATUE.
Area of focus |
Status |
Comments |
Setting/circumstance |
Restricted |
Privacy language in the state constitution restricts testing to reasonable suspicion situations. Random is permitted in safety-sensitive occupations per case law. |
Drugs tested (panel) |
Not Defined |
|
Specimens permitted |
Not Defined |
|
POCT screening devices |
Restricted |
Testing location may need to be licensed through state as a laboratory. Only FDA-cleared devices are permitted. |
Alcohol testing |
Permitted |
|
EAP |
Caution |
Case law underscores the importance of educating workers. |
Certified laboratory |
Required |
State has a laboratory licensing law that applies to drug testing. |
WC premium discount |
Not Mentioned |
|
WC claim denial or reduction |
Permitted |
Refer to New Jersey Statutes Annotated §34:15-7 does not refer to drug testing procedures. |
Unemployment denial |
Permitted |
Refer to New Jersey Statutes Annotated §34:21-5 does not refer to drug testing procedures. |
NEW MEXICO
Legal status for workplace drug and alcohol testing
New Mexico does not have a drug testing statute; however, in workers’ compensation denial cases employers must demonstrate compliance with the DOT drug and alcohol testing regulations.
THIS STATE DOES NOT HAVE A DRUG TESTING STATUE.
Area of focus |
Status |
Comments |
Setting/circumstance |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
Drugs tested (panel) |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
DOT drug and alcohol testing procedures must be observed in workers’ compensation denial cases. |
Specimens permitted |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
DOT drug and alcohol testing procedures must be observed in workers’ compensation denial cases. |
POCT screening devices |
Permitted |
|
Alcohol testing |
Permitted |
DOT drug and alcohol testing procedures must be observed in workers’ compensation denial cases. |
EAP |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
Certified laboratory |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
DOT drug and alcohol testing procedures must be observed in workers’ compensation denial cases. |
WC premium discount |
Not Mentioned |
|
WC claim denial or reduction |
Permitted |
Refer to New Mexico Stat. Ann. §52-1-11, 12, & 12.1. Full denial if intoxication is cause of accident. 10% reduction if intoxication is only contributing factor. Must follow DOT regs. in order to use drug test result as proof of intoxication. |
Unemployment denial |
Permitted |
Refer to New Mexico Stat. Ann. §51-1-7(2) concerning misconduct as means for disqualification; intoxication is not specified as misconduct in statutory language. |
Legal status for workplace drug and alcohol testing
New York does not have a drug testing statute. However, Code Rule 60 is a voluntary program that permits employers to put certain safety-related programs in place that qualify them for workers’ compensation credits. This chart does not re ect the requirements of Code Rule 60.
THIS STATE DOES NOT HAVE A DRUG TESTING STATUE.
Area of focus |
Status |
Comments |
Setting/circumstance |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
Drugs tested (panel) |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
Specimens permitted |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
POCT screening devices |
See Comments |
On-site testing facilities are subject to regulation under the state’s clinical laboratory licensing law per the Dept. of Health. |
Alcohol testing |
Permitted |
|
EAP |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
Certified laboratory |
Required |
|
WC premium discount |
Not Mentioned |
|
WC claim denial or reduction |
Permitted |
Refer to NY Workers Compensation Law §10 and §21. |
Unemployment denial |
Permitted |
Refer to NYS Article 18 Title 7 Section 593 concerning “misconduct.” The law does not provide a definition of misconduct. |
NORTH CAROLINA
Legal status for workplace drug and alcohol testing
North Carolina is a drug-testing–friendly state. Few restrictions apply.
NC GEN. STAT. 95-230 TO 95-235 (2003) NC ADMINISTRATIVE CODE TITLE 13 R. 20.0100 TO 20.0602 (2004)
Area of focus |
Status |
Comments |
Setting/circumstance |
Defined |
All types of testing are permitted, as long as they take place at a certified laboratory. The only exception is applicant testing where one may use an on-site testing device. |
Drugs tested (panel) |
Not Defined |
|
Specimens permitted |
Defined |
Urine, blood, hair or oral fluids. |
POCT screening devices |
See Comments |
For prospective employees only; confirmation of positives required with GC-MS (See No. Carolina Admin. Code 20.0203). |
Alcohol testing |
Permitted |
|
EAP |
Not Mentioned |
|
Certified laboratory |
Required |
CAP or SAMHSA. |
WC premium discount |
Not Mentioned |
|
WC claim denial or reduction |
Permitted |
Refer to North Carolina Gen. Stat. §97-12. |
Unemployment denial |
NORTH DAKOTA
Legal status for workplace drug and alcohol testing
While North Dakota does not have a drug testing statute, in order to move to
deny workers’ compensation bene ts an employer must conduct drug/alcohol testing in accordance with certain requirements established by the state, such as,
in some circumstances, compliance with some aspects of the U.S. DOT regulations.
THIS STATE DOES NOT HAVE A DRUG TESTING STATUTE.
Area of focus |
Status |
Comments |
Setting/circumstance |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
Drugs tested (panel) |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
Specimens permitted |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
POCT screening devices |
Permitted |
|
Alcohol testing |
Permitted |
|
EAP |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
Certified laboratory |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
WC premium discount |
Not Mentioned |
|
WC claim denial or reduction |
Permitted |
Refer to North Dakota Century Code §65-01-02(10)(b)(3). Refusal to submit to a drug test is also grounds for denial of benefits. Refer to N.D. Cent. Code §65-01-11. |
Unemployment denial |
Permitted |
Refer to North Dakota Century Code §52-06-02(2) concerning “misconduct.” According to the North Dakota Job Services Unemployment Insurance Claim Guide, violation of a posted or known company rule is means for disqualification. |
OHIO
Legal status for workplace drug and alcohol testing
Ohio has a voluntary drug testing law. For companies that wish to qualify for a discount on their workers’ compensation premiums they must comply with this law; other companies are not mandated to comply. Additionally, the state’s workers’ compensation law contains very speci c requirements relative to drug/ alcohol testing. THIS CHART REFLECTS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE VOLUNTARY LAW.
OHIO BUREAU WORKERS’ COMPENSATION DRUG-FREE SAFETY PROGRAM
Area of focus |
Status |
Comments |
Setting/circumstance |
Defined |
All types of testing are required and certain conditions apply (applicant, reasonable suspicion, post-accident, return-to-duty, random, and follow-up). Exceptions: periodic exam is not required and sometimes alcohol is not required. |
Drugs tested (panel) |
Defined |
Opiates, cocaine, marijuana, amphetamines and PCP. Additionally “those acknowledged as drugs of abuse in the company’s local communities,” prescription meds, barbiturates, benzodiazepines, methadone, and propoxyphene; outside program no restrictions apply. |
Specimens permitted |
Defined |
Urine for drug testing; breath or blood for alcohol testing. Saliva may be permitted for alcohol testing. |
POCT screening devices |
See Comments |
Follow SAMHSA guidelines; the old program was amended to permit on-site testing but the new program makes no mention of alternative testing methods or specimens, but continually refers to the SAMHSA guidelines. |
Alcohol testing |
In Some Cases |
See Setting / Circumstances; 0.04 BAC recommended |
EAP |
See Comments |
Requirements vary depending on level of participation. |
Certified laboratory |
Required |
SAMHSA-certified lab only. |
WC premium discount |
Permitted |
4-7% plus bonus discounts for qualifying participants in the program. |
WC claim denial or reduction |
Permitted |
Refer to Ohio Admin. Code §4123.54. See statute for exact details; many restrictions apply. These include DHHS cutoff levels for some substances and DHHS lab certification at a minimum |
Unemployment denial |
Permitted |
Refer to Ohio Admin Code §4141.29(D)(1)(b), concerning “misconduct.” |
OKLAHOMA
Legal status for workplace drug and alcohol testing
This is a drug testing friendly state. Oklahoma’s Title 40 was amended by the passage of OK53RHB 2033 (May 9, 2011) as well as OK53HRB 2204 (May 8, 2012). The changes went into effect November 1, 2011 and May 8, 2012 respectively and are re ected here. This law applies to public and private sector employers.
OKLAHOMA STATUES ANNOTATED TITLE 40. LABOR CHAPTER 15. STANDARDS FOR WORKPLACE DRUG AND ALCOHOL TESTING ACT OKLAHOMA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 310:638
Area of focus |
Status |
Comments |
Setting/circumstance |
Restricted |
All types of testing are permitted but some restrictions apply (i.e. post-offer only for applicant, safety-sensitive only for periodic exam, return to duty, etc.). |
Drugs tested (panel) |
Defined* |
“Drug means amphetamines, cannabinoids, cocaine, phencyclidine (PCP), hallucinogens, methaqualone, opiates, barbiturates, benzodiazepines, synthetic narcotics, designer drugs, or a metabolite thereof.” *Department of Health lists drugs approved for testing in urine and saliva, and different, shorter list of drugs approved for testing in hair. |
Specimens permitted |
Defined |
“Sample means tissue, fluid or product of the human body chemically capable of revealing the presence of drugs or alcohol in the human body.” Board of Health lists urine, saliva and hair for drug screens and confirmations; breath or saliva for alcohol screens and breath or blood for confirmation. |
POCT screening devices |
Permitted |
FDA-approved devices only for drug testing; NHTSA conforming products list for alcohol testing; confirmation required for positives. |
Alcohol testing |
Permitted |
Law was amended (May 8, 2012) via HB 2204. Language requiring confirmation of a breathalyzer test before dismissal has been removed. State Board of Health still has power to promulgate, prescribe, amend and repeal rules for licensure/regulation of testing facilities. |
EAP |
Not Required |
Prior requirement repealed in 2011. |
Certified laboratory |
Required |
Consistent with federal regulations/State Bd. of Health; labs certified for urine testing by SAMHSA and CAP-FUDT; other lab certifications may be acceptable. |
WC premium discount |
Not Mentioned |
|
WC claim denial or reduction |
Permitted |
Refer to Oklahoma Statute Annotated Title 85 § 312(3). |
Unemployment denial |
Permitted |
Refer to Oklahoma Statute Annotated Title 40, §2-406.1. This law was amended in May 2012. |
OREGON
Legal status for workplace drug and alcohol testing
Oregon has two laws that regulate laboratory-related issues; however, some components of those laws directly impact how drug testing is conducted.
OR. REV. STAT. 438.435 (2005) OR ADMIN. R. 333-024-0305 TO 333-024-0365 (2004)
Area of focus |
Status |
Comments |
Setting/circumstance |
Not Defined |
|
Drugs tested (panel) |
Not Defined |
|
Specimens permitted |
Defined |
Body fluids obtained from a live person. |
POCT screening devices |
Permitted |
Employers conducting on-site tests must register with the Health Div. of the Dept. of Human Services and pay a registration fee of no more than $50; FDA-approved device only. Other requirements apply. |
Alcohol testing |
Permitted |
May conduct reasonable suspicion alcohol tests or when the individual gives consent to be tested; device must be NHTSA-approved and conform to 49 CFR part 40; employer must pay for the test. |
EAP |
Not Mentioned |
|
Certified laboratory |
Required |
|
WC premium discount |
Not Mentioned |
|
WC claim denial or reduction |
Permitted |
Refer to Oregon Rev. Stat. § 656.005(7)(b)(C). |
Unemployment denial |
Permitted |
Refer to Oregon Rev. Stat. § 657.176; OR Admin. R.471-030-0036, 0-0125, 0126. |
PENNSYLVANIA
Legal status for workplace drug and alcohol testing
Pennsylvania is a drug testing-friendly state with no restrictive statute in place. THIS STATE DOES NOT HAVE A DRUG TESTING STATUTE.
Area of focus |
Status |
Comments |
Setting/circumstance |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
Drugs tested (panel) |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
Specimens permitted |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
POCT screening devices |
Permitted |
|
Alcohol testing |
Permitted |
|
EAP |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
Certified laboratory |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
WC premium discount |
Not Mentioned |
|
WC claim denial or reduction |
Permitted |
Refer to Pennsylvania Unconsolidated Statutes §77-431. |
Unemployment denial |
Permitted |
Refer to Unemployment Compensation Law 1936-1 Article IV, Section 402 (e.1). |
PUERTO RICO
Legal status for workplace drug and alcohol testing
Puerto Rico has a relatively restrictive drug and alcohol testing statute. It is recommended LAWS OF PUERTO RICO ANN. that employers consult the statutory language to be sure of compliance. Testing regulations §29-8-161 TO 161H apply to public sector.
Area of focus |
Status |
Comments |
Setting/circumstance |
Permitted |
All testing circumstances are permitted: applicant, reasonable suspicion, post-accident, periodic exam, return-to-duty, random, and follow-up. Some restrictions apply. Applicant testing must take place as part of a general physical-medical examination. Reasonable suspicion must take place within 24 hours of event or observation giving rise to reasonable suspicion. Post-accident is prohibited when individual is not in full control of mental functions due to accident, unless a medical order provides otherwise. |
Drugs tested (panel) |
Mentioned |
Schedule I & II of Title 24 §2202 of the “Controlled Substances Act of Puerto Rico.” |
Specimens permitted |
Mentioned |
Law de nes specimen as “a suf cient amount of urine or any bodily uid or tissue obtained in a non-invasive manner.” |
POCT screening devices |
Prohibited |
|
Alcohol testing |
Permitted |
Not directly mentioned, but not expressly prohibited by law. |
EAP |
Not Mentioned |
|
Certified laboratory |
Required |
Must “substantially” meet NIDA guidelines. |
WC premium discount |
Not Mentioned |
|
WC claim denial or reduction |
Permitted |
Separate law: 11 §5 does not refer to drug testing procedures. |
Unemployment denial |
Permitted |
Separate law: 29 §704 mentions misconduct, but does not discuss drug testing procedures. |
RHODE ISLAND
Legal status for workplace drug and alcohol testing
Rhode Island limits drug testing of employees to circumstances in which there is suspicion of drug use or impairment. First-time positives may not result in termination. Employers are responsible to pay for treatment services for employees. Other restrictions apply.
GEN. LAWS 28-6.5-1 TO 28-6.5-2
Area of focus |
Status |
Comments |
Setting/circumstance |
Restricted |
The following types of testing are permitted: applicant (post-offer), reasonable suspicion, post-accident (with reasonable suspicion), return-to-duty, and follow-up. The following types of testing are prohibited: periodic exam and random. |
Drugs tested (panel) |
Not Defined |
|
Specimens permitted |
Defined |
“Urine, blood or any other bodily fluid or tissue.” |
POCT screening devices |
Permitted |
Confirmation of initial screen positives is required even for pre-employment screens. |
Alcohol testing |
Permitted |
|
EAP |
See Comments |
Must refer to treatment services before termination. |
Certified laboratory |
Not Mentioned |
|
WC premium discount |
Not Mentioned |
|
WC claim denial or reduction |
Permitted |
Refer to Rhode Island General Laws §28-33-2. |
Unemployment denial |
Permitted |
Refer to Rhode Island General Laws §28-44-18 concerning “misconduct”; law does not mention |
SOUTH CAROLINA
Legal status for workplace drug and alcohol testing
This state has a voluntary drug testing law. For companies that wish to qualify for a 5% discount on their workers’ compensation premiums they must comply with this law; other companies are not mandated to comply. Employers have wide latitude in the development of their programs. THIS CHART REFLECTS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE VOLUNTARY LAW.
SC CODE ANN. 41-1-15 (SUPP 2005) & 38-73-500 (2002)
Area of focus |
Status |
Comments |
Setting/circumstance |
Defined |
All types of testing are permitted. Random is required of all workers who receive wages or compensation in any form. |
Drugs tested (panel) |
Not Defined |
|
Specimens permitted |
Not Defined |
|
POCT screening devices |
Permitted |
|
Alcohol testing |
Permitted |
|
EAP |
Not Mentioned |
|
Certified laboratory |
Not Mentioned |
|
WC premium discount |
Permitted |
At least 5%. |
WC claim denial or reduction |
Permitted |
Refer to South Carolina Code Ann. §42-9-60. |
Unemployment denial |
Permitted |
Refer to South Carolina Code Ann. §41-35-120(3) & (4)(iv). Blood, hair, urine or oral fluid specimens are permitted. Law requires a laboratory test. Collection personnel must meet federal or state guidelines. GC-MS confirmation when applicable. |
SOUTH DAKOTA
Legal status for workplace drug and alcohol testing
South Dakota does not restrict how or when drug testing is conducted or whom employers can require to be drug tested.
THIS STATE DOES NOT HAVE A DRUG TESTING STATUTE.
Area of focus |
Status |
Comments |
Setting/circumstance |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
Drugs tested (panel) |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
Schedule I or II drugs for denying workers’ compensation claims. |
Specimens permitted |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
POCT screening devices |
Permitted |
|
Alcohol testing |
Permitted |
|
EAP |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
Certified laboratory |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
WC premium discount |
Not Mentioned |
|
WC claim denial or reduction |
Permitted |
Refer to South Dakota Codified Laws Ann. §62-4-37. |
Unemployment denial |
Permitted |
Refer to South Dakota Codified Laws Ann. §61-6-14 and -14.1 concerning “misconduct.” Law defines misconduct as breaking a company rule or standard, but does not mention drug testing or intoxication as part of definition. |
TENNESSEE
Legal status for workplace drug and alcohol testing
Tennessee has a voluntary drug testing law. For companies that wish to qualify for a 5% discount (including self-insured companies) on their workers’ compensation premiums they must comply with this law; other companies are not mandated to comply. THIS CHART REFLECTS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE VOLUNTARY LAW.
TENN. CODE ANN. 50-9-101 TO -112 (2005);TENN. COMP. R. & REGS. CH. 0800-2-12 (1999)
Area of focus |
Status |
Comments |
Setting/circumstance |
Defined |
All types of testing required except for random (which is permitted but not required) and return-to-duty (which is not mentioned). Some conditions apply to all types of required testing (such as post-offer for applicant, follow up for employees who voluntarily submit to rehab). |
Drugs tested (panel) |
Defined |
SAMHSA panel plus alcohol. |
Specimens permitted |
Defined |
“Tissue, fluid or a product of the human body capable of revealing the presence of alcohol or drugs or their metabolites” … however, oral fluid and hair testing are prohibited under the voluntary law. |
POCT screening devices |
Prohibited |
|
Alcohol testing |
See Comments |
Required in some instances involving safety-sensitive workers. Breath and saliva per the federal guidelines. |
EAP |
Not Required |
However, must provide information on EAPs in policy. |
Certified laboratory |
Required |
SAMHSA, CAP, or other authority recognized by the state; lab must comply with DOT lab regulations or other procedures approved by the state. |
WC premium discount |
Permitted |
5%. |
WC claim denial or reduction |
Permitted |
Refer to Tenn. Comp. R. & Regs. §0800-2-.12-.01 (1)(a) & (d). |
Unemployment denial |
Permitted |
Refer to T.C.A. §50-7-303(a)(2). |
TEXAS
Legal status for workplace drug and alcohol testing
Texas has a drug test cheating law. There is also a law that requires certain employers to report positive drug test results to the state Department of Transportation.
THIS STATE DOES NOT HAVE A DRUG TESTING STATUTE.
Area of focus |
Status |
Comments |
Setting/circumstance |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
Drugs tested (panel) |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
Specimens permitted |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
POCT screening devices |
Permitted |
|
Alcohol testing |
Permitted |
|
EAP |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
Certified laboratory |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
WC premium discount |
Not Mentioned |
|
WC claim denial or reduction |
Permitted |
Refer to Texas Lab. Code Ann. §406.032 (and §401.013 for definition of “Intoxication”). |
Unemployment denial |
Permitted |
Refer to Texas Lab. Code Ann. §207.044. SB 21 (2013) added drug testing requirements to UC law. There is significant case law that affects this. See TWC Appeal No. 97-003744-10-040997. |
UTAH
Legal status for workplace drug and alcohol testing
Utah has a voluntary drug testing law. For companies that wish to qualify for limited legal pro- tection they must comply with this law; other companies are not mandated to comply. Workers’ or unemployment compensation appeals involving substance abuse require compliance with the voluntary law. THIS CHART REFLECTS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE VOLUNTARY LAW.
UTAH CODE ANN. 34-38-1 TO 34-38-15
Area of focus |
Status |
Comments |
Setting/circumstance |
Defined |
All types of testing are permitted. The only condition is that if testing is conducted, it must be conducted of all employees, including management. Post-accident also includes theft. |
Drugs tested (panel) |
Not Defined |
However, definition of drug includes “a substance recognized as a drug in the United States Pharmaco- poeia, the National Formulary, the Homeopathic Pharmacopoeia, or other drug compendia, or supple- ment to any of those compendia.” |
Specimens permitted |
Defined |
Urine, blood, breath, saliva, or hair. |
POCT screening devices |
Permitted |
Positives must be confirmed. |
Alcohol testing |
Permitted |
|
EAP |
Not Mentioned |
|
Certified laboratory |
Required |
Certified by US Dept. of Health and Human Services under the National Laboratory Certification Program. |
WC premium discount |
Not Mentioned |
|
WC claim denial or reduction |
Permitted |
Refer to Utah Code Ann. §34A-2-302. Employer must comply with the requirements found in UTAH CODE ANN. 34-38-1 TO 34-38-15 as outlined in this chart in order to qualify to deny benefits. |
Unemployment denial |
Permitted |
Refer to Utah Rule R994-405-208 (7). Employer must comply with the requirements found in UTAH CODE ANN. 34-38-1 to 34-38-15 as outlined in this chart in order to qualify to deny benefits. |
VERMONT
Legal status for workplace drug and alcohol testing
Vermont’s drug testing law is one of the most restrictive in the nation. Random testing is prohibited. Some type of EAP or referral service is required in order to conduct drug testing. This law also applies to public sector workplace drug testing.
VT STAT. ANN. TITLE 21, 511-520 (2003) VT ADC 13140 003 (2003)
Area of focus |
Status |
Comments |
Setting/circumstance |
Restricted |
All types of testing except for random permitted but restrictions apply (i.e. must have reasonable sus- picion, post-offer for applicant, reasonable suspicion and post-accident must meet definition, etc.). Random is prohibited. |
Drugs tested (panel) |
Defined |
Schedule I drugs and others listed in the statute. |
Specimens permitted |
Defined |
Urine or hair for drug testing/breath for alcohol testing/donor may request a blood sample be drawn at the time of the urine or breath collection. |
POCT screening devices |
Prohibited |
Only refers to lab-based testing & qualifications of labs. |
Alcohol testing |
Permitted |
Breath only; technician must be certified by state; BAC of 0.02 shall be reported as a positive; confirma- tion test required within 10-20 minutes after screen. |
EAP |
Required |
Must have an EAP or be able to refer employees to available services in the community. |
Certified laboratory |
Required |
At lab approved by Vermont Dept. of Health. |
WC premium discount |
Not Mentioned |
|
WC claim denial or reduction |
Permitted |
Refer to Vermont Stat. Ann. §21-649 refers to intoxication only. |
Unemployment denial |
Permitted |
Refer to Vermont Stat. Ann. §21-17-1344 concerning “gross misconduct” and “intoxication.” |
VIRGINIA
Legal status for workplace drug and alcohol testing
A voluntary law exists with a up to 5% workers’ compensation premium discount avail- able for companies that comply with criteria established by insurer; companies in the mining industry are required to comply with the provisions of the “voluntary” law. This chart does not re ect the requirements that apply to the mining industry.
THIS STATE DOES NOT HAVE A DRUG-TESTING STATUTE.
Area of focus |
Status |
Comments |
Setting/circumstance |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
Drugs tested (panel) |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
Mining industry must test for the following substances: amphetamines, cannabis/THC, cocaine, opiates, phencyclidine (PHP), benzodiazepines, propoxyphene, methaqualone, methadone, barbiturates, and synthetic narcotics. |
Specimens permitted |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
POCT screening devices |
Permitted |
|
Alcohol testing |
Permitted |
|
EAP |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
Certified laboratory |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
SAMHSA lab as part of mining industry drug testing. |
WC premium discount |
Permitted |
Refer to Virginia Code Ann. §65.2-813.2. Up to 5%. |
WC claim denial or reduction |
Permitted |
Refer to Virginia Code Ann. §65.2-306. |
Unemployment denial |
Permitted |
Refer to Virginia Code Ann. §60.2-618(2)(b) & (3)(d). |
WASHINGTON
Legal status for workplace drug and alcohol testing
Washington does not have a drug testing statute; therefore, no statutory restrictions apply.
THIS STATE DOES NOT HAVE A DRUG TESTING STATUTE.
Area of focus |
Status |
Comments |
Setting/circumstance |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
Drugs tested (panel) |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
Specimens permitted |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
POCT screening devices |
Permitted |
|
Alcohol testing |
Permitted |
|
EAP |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
Certified laboratory |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
WC premium discount |
Not Mentioned |
|
WC claim denial or reduction |
Not Mentioned |
|
Unemployment denial |
Permitted |
Refer to R.C.W. §50-20-060 concerning misconduct. |
WEST VIRGINIA
Legal status for workplace drug and alcohol testing
West Virginia does not have a general mandatory drug testing statute; however, important case law limits drug testing situations to safety-sensitive and reasonable sus- picion. As well, the state does mandate drug and alcohol testing of certain
workers involved in Public Works Improvement projects.
THIS STATE DOES NOT HAVE A DRUG TESTING STATUTE.
Area of focus |
Status |
Comments |
Setting/circumstance |
Restricted |
Case law limits testing to safety-sensitive and reasonable suspicion. |
Drugs tested (panel) |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
Public Works drug testing program must include the following drugs: marijuana, cocaine, opiates (includ- ing hydromorphone, oxycodone, hydrocodone), phencyclidine, amphetamines, barbiturates, benzodiaz- epines, methadone and propoxyphene. |
Specimens permitted |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
For public improvement contractors and subcontractors urine for drug and alcohol testing. |
POCT screening devices |
Permitted |
|
Alcohol testing |
Permitted |
For public improvement contractors and subcontractors urine for drug and alcohol testing. |
EAP |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
Required for public improvement contractors and subcontractors. |
Certified laboratory |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
SAMHSA-certified lab is required as part of a public works employer’s program. |
WC premium discount |
Not Mentioned |
|
WC claim denial or reduction |
Permitted |
Refer to West Virginia Code §23-4-2(a). |
Unemployment denial |
Permitted |
Refer to West Virginia Code §21A-6-3(2). |
WISCONSIN
Legal status for workplace drug and alcohol testing
Wisconsin is a drug-testing friendly state with THIS STATE DOES NOT HAVE A no restrictions on workplace drug testing. DRUG TESTING STATUTE.
Area of focus |
Status |
Comments |
Setting/circumstance |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
Reasonable suspicion, post-accident, and random are required of public works contractors and subcontractors. |
Drugs tested (panel) |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
Public workers programs require the SAMHSA panel; otherwise, no restrictions apply. |
Specimens permitted |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
POCT screening devices |
Permitted |
|
Alcohol testing |
Permitted |
Required of public works contractors and subcontractors (and must comply with federal regulations). |
EAP |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
Certified laboratory |
No Requirements or Restrictions |
|
WC premium discount |
Not Mentioned |
|
WC claim denial or reduction |
Permitted |
Refer to Wisconsin Statutes §102.58. 15% discount not exceeding $15,000. |
Unemployment denial |
Permitted |
Refer to Wisconsin Statutes §108.04(5), concerning misconduct. |
WYOMING
Legal status for workplace drug and alcohol testing
Wyoming has a voluntary drug testing law. For companies that wish to qualify for a 5% discount on their workers’ compensation premiums they must comply with this law; other companies are not mandated to comply. THIS CHART REFLECTS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE VOLUNTARY LAW.
RULES, REGULATIONS AND FEE SCHEDULES OF THE WYOMING WORKERS’ SAFETY AND COMPENSATION DIVISION CHAPTER 1, CHAPTER, 2, & CHAPTER 10
Area of focus |
Status |
Comments |
Setting/circumstance |
Defined |
The following types of testing are required and have conditions: applicant, reasonable suspicion, post-accident, random. The following types of testing are permitted but not required: periodic exam, return-to-duty, follow-up. |
Drugs tested (panel) |
Defined |
Cocaine, marijuana, opiates, amphetamines and PCP |
Specimens permitted |
Defined |
Lab-based urine only for employee drug testing; urine, hair or saliva for applicant testing (lab or on-site). |
POCT screening devices |
Limited |
Specifically allowed for random, reasonable suspicion, and pre-employment. Post-accident must follow DOT rules – thus no POCT. |
Alcohol testing |
Permitted |
Mirror DOT regs in most ways. 0.08 or higher is considered positive; EBT or “QED” saliva devices are permitted for alcohol screening; BAT or STT required. |
EAP |
Mentioned |
Not required to have an EAP, but must inform employees of the availability of EAP services either through the company or in the community; must maintain a “resource file” of available EAP services. |
Certified laboratory |
Required |
SAMHSA-certified lab per DOT/SAMHSA regs except for pre-employment testing which may be on-site. |
WC premium discount |
Permitted |
Up to 5%. |
WC claim denial or reduction |
Permitted |
Refer to Wyoming Code Ann. §27-14-102 (a)(xi)(B)(I). |
Unemployment denial |
Permitted |
Refer to Wyoming Statutes Ann. §27-3-311 concerning misconduct. |
THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS NOT OFFERED AS LEGAL ADVICE, BUT IS INSTEAD FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES.